About a dress

Okay, by now we all know about my obsession with movies and awards shows (much thanks to all of you who have put up with my mad posting about movies these past few weeks). And we also all know that I love, love, love fashion. Therefore: Fashion + Movies + Awards Shows = Supremely Divine. However, when it's reported as near scandal that Reese Witherspoon showed up in the same Chanel dress that Kirsten Dunst wore to a Golden Globe afterparty three years ago, I have to wonder: Don't we have more important things in the world to worry about?

Here's Kirsten in the dress...


And horror of horrors, here's Reese in the same dress...









As reported on ET.online, Chanel has issued the following statement:

CHANEL apologizes for the oversight that Reese Witherspoon's dress was previously worn to a Golden Globes after party three years ago. We are honored that Reese chose to wear CHANEL and thought she looked beautiful. We congratulate her on her well-deserved win.

I mean, does it really really matter????? Is there some sort of conspiracy going on? Is Ms. Kirsten sitting in the wings, cackling, saying: Damn you, Reese! Damn you! I may not have gotten a Golden Globe for Elizabethtown, in fact, it's possible that nobody even saw Elizabethtown, but at least I wore it first!

Oh, please. The dress isn't even that flattering. What is that silver thing anyway? Why on earth would you choose to wear something that cuts your boobs in half? Why out of all the dresses in the world? And more importantly, why on earth would this happen twice?